Amendment of LUMS / LSDF / SDF application in Drakenstein.

SPLUMA requires every municipality to adopt a Spatial Development Framework and obliges decision-makers to consider it. Section 22(1) of SPLUMA provides that a Municipal Planning Tribunal may not approve an application that is inconsistent with the municipal spatial development framework - which is why a proposal that contradicts the SDF often cannot succeed as a rezoning alone, however well motivated.

Amending a policy instrument is a different exercise from applying for a right. The case must be made at the level of spatial logic - why the node, corridor or land use designation should change - and it is assessed against the municipality's integrated development plan, its bulk infrastructure programme and its growth management position, not only against the merits of one site.

These amendments are council-level processes with their own public participation requirements and their own cycles, and they are materially slower than a site-specific application. They are worth pursuing for precinct-scale projects and strategic industrial or logistics sites; for a single erf, it is usually better to test whether the proposal can be framed as consistent with the existing framework.

The Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act 16 of 2013 (SPLUMA) is the national framework: it requires every municipality to adopt its own land use scheme and municipal planning by-law, and it makes the municipality - not the province - the authority of first instance on land development applications.